Keywords: GNSS/GPS, Legislation, Reference systems, Crustal 
		deformation
		
		
		SUMMARY 
		Large-scale crustal deformation over a wide area of eastern Japan was 
		detected by GEONET, Japan's dense Global Positioning System (GPS) 
		network, following the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake 
		occurred on March 11, 2011. Since it was assumed that coordinates of the 
		control points for public surveys, such as GEONET stations, 
		triangulation stations and leveling bench marks, in a wide area were 
		greatly changed and could hardly maintain consistency between nearby 
		stations, the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI) stopped 
		providing ‘Survey Results’ of them, which were the coordinates for 
		survey use, and announced it publicly on March 14, 2011.
		In order to promote various public restoration programs in the affected 
		area, it was strongly required to revise the Survey Results in urgent. 
		On the other hand, because large postseismic deformation had continued 
		widely after the event, it was concerned that even if the Survey Results 
		were updated immediately, they would become unavailable in a short time. 
		Therefore GSI examined the optimal timing to calculate their new 
		coordinates by predicting the amount of future postseismic movement 
		based on the observation data of GEONET stations. Eventually, the new 
		Survey Results of GEONET stations were published on May 31, 2011 and 
		those of triangulation stations and leveling bench marks were done on 
		October 31, 2011 respectively. 
		In this paper we report the revision process of the Survey Results after 
		the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake.
		1. STAOPPAGE OF PROVISSION OF SURVEY RESULTS OF CONTROL POINTS
		The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (hereafter 
		‘Tohoku Earthquake’) was such a major seismic event (Mw=9.0) that 
		occurred at 05:46:23UT and triggered a huge tsunami, causing severe and 
		catastrophic damages along the coast of Tohoku or Kanto district. On 
		this event, large-scale crustal deformation was detected by Japan's wide 
		and dense GPS observation network (GEONET), which had been operated by 
		Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI) since 1996. The station 
		”Oshika”, which is located close to the epicenter, was moved about 5.3m 
		to the east-southeast direction and subsided about 1.2m for instance 
		(Fig. 1). After the main shock, postseismic deformation has been 
		continued widely along the Pacific coast area of eastern Japan and local 
		scale crustal deformations have been observed due to some aftershocks 
		(Suito et al. [2011a, 2011b]). Under those circumstances, it was assumed 
		that the Survey Results of control points, which were coordinates for 
		survey use, were significantly different from their original positions 
		and should no longer be available for the use for public surveys.
		On carrying out the public surveys, precision of the relative position 
		between nearby control points is crucial in terms of maintaining 
		consistency. After some previous earthquakes, such as 2003 Tokachi 
		earthquake and 2008 Iwate-Miyagi earthquake, GSI has examined the area 
		of stoppage of provision of the Survey Results by calculating the amount 
		of crustal strain values by earthquake fault models, which were 
		estimated based on the data from the GEONET stations and determined it 
		with the criteria approximately 2ppm (equivalent to 2cm per 10km). 
		According to this policy, we stopped publication of the Survey Results 
		of the GEONET stations and the triangulation stations of 16 prefectures 
		on March 14, 2011, immediately after the Tohoku Earthquake. In addition, 
		the Survey Results of the leveling bench marks were also suspended on 
		the same day along with leveling routes where estimated vertical 
		deformation was more than a few centimeters.
		In the course of evaluating the recalculated Survey Results of GEONET 
		stations, it came to light that in addition to 16 prefectures, the 
		Survey Results of Toyama, Ishikawa, Fukui and Gifu prefectures were also 
		needed to be updated due to accumulated crustal strain. Therefore, we 
		additionally stopped provision of the Survey Results of triangulation 
		stations in these four prefectures on May 31 when the new Survey Results 
		of GEONET stations, were released. The number of representative control 
		points, including ones with the suspended Survey Results after the 
		Tohoku Earthquake is listed in Table 1.
		2. REQUIRED ACCURACY AND REVISION DATE FOR THE SURVEY RESULTS OF 
		GEONET STATION
		
		Fig. 1 Crustal movements caused by the 2011 off the 
		Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake
		(Left: Horizontal deformation, Right: Vertical deformation)
		
		Table 1 List of the number of control points across 
		Japan and the number of control points
		in 20 prefectures withheld from publication of Survey Results
		
		
		In accordance with the tolerances indicated in the General Standard 
		of Operation 
		Specifications for Public Surveys, the accuracy required for calculating 
		Survey Results of GEONET Stations should be to a point-to-point relative 
		accuracy of 2ppm.
		Since positional data were necessary for restoration/reconstruction of 
		the disaster-stricken area, and would also be utilized in resurvey of 
		triangulation stations and public control points, urgent revision of 
		Survey Results of GEONET stations was required. Meanwhile, to decrease 
		the effect of postseismic deformation, future deformation was estimated 
		based on the observation data of GEONET Stations using the approximation 
		formula with a logarithm function by Marone et al. [1991] as follows:
	
		where c and a are the constants, τlog is the time constant and t is 
		the time elapsed from the earthquake.
		
		The appropriate time of re-publication of revised Survey Results was 
		then discussed based on the predicted deformation (Fig. 2). As a result, 
		we decided that new Survey Results of GEONET stations should be 
		published by the end of May.
		
		
		Fig. 2 (Top diagram) Progression of postseismic 
		deformation observed at the GEONET Station (950167) and (Bottom diagram) 
		predicted deformation
		3. CALCULATION OF SURVEY RESULTS OF GEONET STATION
		Conventionally, new Survey Results were calculated based on existing 
		results. However, since crustal deformation occurred across a large area 
		due to the Tohoku Earthquake, coordinates that correspond to 
		International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2008 (ITRF2008) were 
		calculated based on observation results at the VLBI (Very Long Baseline 
		Interferometry) station (TSUKUB32) located in GSI, Tsukuba, and GEONET. 
		These calculated coordinates were then adopted as new Survey Results for 
		the area where update of Survey Result was required. Existing Survey 
		Results had remained in western Japan and Hokkaido, where there was less 
		crustal movement due to the earthquake. We recognized inconsistency at 
		the boundaries between the existing and updated Survey Results and 
		corrected them with the model described in 3.1.3 to ensure the required 
		accuracy for surveys.
		3.1 Calculation of survey results based on VLBI and GEONET
		
		3.1.1 Coordinates of TSUKUB32 
		The coordinate of TSUKUB32 on ITRF2008 was estimated on the analysis 
		of VLBI observation data of international VLBI session "IVS-R1482", 
		which was conducted on May 10, to adopt the latest coordinates for the 
		revision of the Survey Results. We constrained the ITRF 2008 coordinates 
		of five overseas stations, which were not affected by the earthquake, 
		and the coordinates of TSUKUB32 were calculated. 
		3.1.2 Survey Results Calculation Method 
		
		
		The calculation method for Survey Results with observation results of 
		the VLBI and GEONET is as follows.
		
			- First, the postseismic deformation was calculated from the 
			difference in averages of R3 solutions at the GEONET Station 92110 
			(located in GSI, Tsukuba) between May 8-12 and May 22-26. Next, we 
			calculated the coordinate of TSUKUB32 at 12:00 UTC, May 24 by adding 
			the postseismic deformation to the coordinate calculated from VLBI 
			observation at 5:00 UTC, May 10.
- The coordinates (ITRF2005) at 12:00 UTC, May 24 were calculated 
			by averaging the R3 solution data in May 23-25. Then, we transformed 
			the reference frame from ITRF2005 to ITRF2008.
- Lastly, we combined (1) and (2) with the collocation result in 
			2007 (Miura et al. [2009]) and shifted the R3 solutions so that they 
			were consistent with the coordinate of TSKB based on VLBI. The 
			shifted R3 solutions (R3’ solutions) were used as new Survey Results 
			of GEONET Stations that are located in the area for which 
			publication of Survey Results had been stopped. To obtain the 
			elevations of them, Japanese Geoid Model 2000 (Nakagawa et al. 
			[2002]) was subtracted from ellipsoidal heights of each GEONET 
			Station. 
3.1.3 Adjustment Calculations on Boundary Area 
		Discrepancies across the boundaries of areas with updated Survey 
		Results and those with no updates had been caused by accumulated crustal 
		strain since January 1, 1997 - when Geodetic Coordinates 2000 was 
		published- . Thus, we calculated correction values for the revised 
		Survey Results so that the amount of discrepancy across the boundaries 
		became 2ppm or smaller. Since the strait lies between the main island of 
		Japan and Hokkaido, corrections were applied to only western boundaries 
		region. The corrections were not applied for the elevations, because 
		they were confirmed to satisfy the tolerances specified in General 
		Standard of Operation Specifications for Public Surveys.
		The differences between the new Survey Results and previously 
		established results at each GEONET station are shown in Fig. 3. It 
		should be noted that the Survey Results mainly around the Tohoku 
		district had differences as large as 5m whereas the amount of 
		differences progressively decreased as getting closer to the western 
		boundary . It was also confirmed that discrepancies observed within the 
		corrected area were mostly smaller than 2ppm, which would not affect 
		public surveys in that area.
		
		
		Fig. 3 Differences between before and after the 
		revision of Survey Results of GEONET stations
		(Horizontal deformation)
		3.2 Re-publication of Survey Results of GEONET Stations 
		On May 31, updated Survey Results of 438 GEONET stations were 
		released, and it became available to carry out public surveys using 
		GEONET stations in the affected area and its vicinity. On the same day, 
		publication of Survey Results of triangulation stations installed in 
		Toyama, Ishikawa, Fukui and Gifu prefectures were stopped. 
		4. AMEMDMENT OF COORDINATE/ELEVATION OF ORIGINS OF JAPANESE 
		HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL CONTROL NETWORK 
		In Article 11 of the Survey Act, it is stated that for basic surveys 
		or public surveys, the standards for position are that it be represented 
		by geographical latitude and longitude and height above the mean sea 
		level. For this, a survey origin for the geographical latitude and 
		longitude is Nihon Keiido Genten (Origin of the Japanese Horizontal 
		Control Network) and an origin for the mean sea level is Nihon Suijun 
		Genten (Origin of the Japanese Vertical Control Network). The position 
		and coordinate/elevation of the origins are respectively prescribed in 
		Article 2, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Order for Enforcement of the Survey 
		Act.
		Since the positions of the Origins of the Japanese Horizontal and 
		Vertical Control Network had shifted, resulting in the prescribed 
		coordinate and elevation being far off the current position after the 
		earthquake, the coordinate and elevation of those origins were amended 
		to ensure the accuracy of surveys. 
		4.1 Amendment of Coordinate of the Origin of the Japanese 
		Horizontal Control Network 
		To newly calculate coordinate of the Origin of the Japanese 
		Horizontal Control Network, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) 
		observations were conducted between June 21 and 25 at the VLBI marker 
		for TSUKUB32, which is installed on the GSI in Tsukuba, as well as at 
		the Origin of the Japanese Horizontal Control Network.
		The coordinates of the Origin of the Japanese Horizontal Control Network 
		newly calculated through these observations and the azimuth from the 
		Origin of the Japanese Horizontal Control Network to the VLBI marker for 
		TSUKUB32 are shown in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. 
		Table 2 Amended coordinates of the Origin of the 
		Japanese Horizontal Control Network
		
		
		Table 3 Azimuth from the Origin of the Japanese 
		Horizontal Control Network to the VLBI marker at GSI, Tsukuba
		
		
		4.2 Amendment of Elevation of the Origin of the Japanese Vertical 
		Control Network 
		Sea levels recorded at the Aburatsubo tide station before and after 
		the Tohoku Earthquake showed that no significant tidal change associated 
		with the earthquake was observed. Although GPS observations showed that 
		"P Aburatsubo" (GPS observation point located in the Aburatsubo tide 
		station site) and the GEONET station "Miura 2" located nearby had sunk 
		by several centimeters following the March 11 earthquake, the amount of 
		sinkage tends to decrease with the progress of postseismic deformations. 
		No significant change in ellipsoidal height was observed between 
		pre-earthquake (January 2011) GPS observation results and 
		post-earthquake (July 2011) results in terms of uncertainty of GPS 
		observations. Therefore, new elevation of the Origin of the Japanese 
		Vertical Control Network was calculated through the following procedures 
		(1) and (2) and then verified by the procedure(3). 
		
			- When the elevation of the Origin of the Japanese Vertical 
			Control Network was fixed based on leveling results from the region 
			between the Aburatsubo tide station and the Origin of the Japanese 
			Vertical Control Network in January 2011 prior to the earthquake, 
			the height of the reference point at the Aburatsubo tide station was 
			determined to be 2.4173m.
- By fixing the elevation of the reference point at the Abratsubo 
			tide station obtained in (1), the new elevation of the Origin of the 
			Japanese Vertical Control Network calculated based on leveling 
			results of July 2011 was determined to be 24.3904m.
- For verification, the elevation of the Origin of the Japanese 
			Vertical Control Network was calculated based on the results of 
			leveling between the VLBI marker for TSKUB32 and the Origin of the 
			Japanese Vertical Control Network with the result of 24.4007m. 
With regard to standard deviation of the network adjustment of the 
		leveling, since the estimated error of +/-0.0026m may be contained in 
		the results shown in (1) and (2), the newly amended elevation of the 
		Origin of the Japanese Vertical Control Network should be 24.3900m after 
		rounding off the ten-thousandth place. 
		4.3 Amendment of the Order for Enforcement of the Survey Act 
		
		Since the coordinate/elevation of the origins of the Japanese 
		Horizontal/Vertical Control Network were prescribed respectively in 
		Article 2, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Order for Enforcement of the Survey 
		Act, the order needed to be amended. Also, because Article 11 of the 
		Survey Act requires Survey Results of control points to be expressed 
		relative to these origins, the order for enforcement must first be 
		amended before the Survey Results of control points can be revised. 
		After being processed through required procedures, a cabinet decision on 
		the amendment of the Order for Enforcement of the Survey Act was reached 
		on October 18, 2011, followed by promulgation and implementation on 
		October 21, 2011. 
		5. REVISION OF SURVEY RESULTS OF TRIANGULATION STATIONS 
		To ensure accuracy of the revised Survey Results of triangulation 
		station, it is desired that surveys are conducted on-site at 
		triangulation stations. However, in terms of time and cost it is not 
		always practical to conduct surveys at each and every triangulation 
		station due to the fact that publication of Survey Results for more than 
		40,000 triangulation stations was stopped. Since the observed crustal 
		deformation due to the Tohoku Earthquake was relatively similar in a 
		wide area, precise geodetic surveys were to be conducted only at a 
		selected number of triangulation stations - similar to practices 
		followed after the Tokachi-oki Earthquake in 2003 (Doi et al. [2005]) - 
		and triangulation stations not targeted for resurvey were to have their 
		Survey Results recalculated using correction parameters. In addition, 
		latitudes and longitudes of triangulation stations in the affected 20 
		prefectures (including Tokyo) for which publication of Survey Results 
		was stopped were to be revised. Elevations of triangulation stations in 
		six Tohoku prefectures and Ibaraki also needed to be revised since 
		significant vertical movements (more than 10cm) immediately after the 
		earthquake and certain vertical movements due to postseismic crustal 
		activities were observed throughout the Pacific coast area covering the 
		Tohoku district and Ibaraki. While conducting triangulation station 
		surveys and precise geodetic surveys after the March 12 earthquake which 
		occurred near the boundary between Nagano and Niigata prefectures, 
		elevations of that area were revised as well. 
		5.1 Triangulation Station Resurveys 
		Within the area for which publication of Survey Results was stopped, 
		precise geodetic surveys were conducted at 595 points. Also, within the 
		Pacific coast area (close to the epicenter and tsunami devastated 
		sites), the Nagano-Niigata boundary area and the Hamadori region of 
		Fukushima where one of aftershocks occurred on April 11, resurvey of 
		1,272 triangulation stations were conducted. 
		5.2 Recalculation of Survey Results of Triangulation Stations 
		
		Of the triangulation stations not slated for resurvey, 73 stations 
		had their Survey Results recalculated based on data of previous 
		observation. For remaining triangulation stations, a new set of 
		correction parameters were developed and Survey Results of the 
		triangulation stations were recalculated using PatchJGD, the software 
		for correcting geodetic coordinates (Tobita, 2009). The number of the 
		stations recalculated by the software was 41,392. 
		5.3 Correction Parameters 
		To recalculate the Survey Results of triangulation stations, 
		correction parameters for coordinates (horizontal) and elevations were 
		developed using both previous and revised Survey Results of GEONET 
		stations and the triangulation stations for precise geodetic surveys. 
		The correction parameters were constructed by estimating variations at 
		the southwest corner of a third-order mesh code from displacements of 
		GEONET stations and triangulation stations using the Kriging method and 
		were extracted so as to cover the land area.
		The constructed parameters were not only used for recalculation of 
		triangulation stations but were also available to general users for use 
		in corrections of public control points. For this reason, the 
		coordinates calculated through the correction parameters were verified 
		(external evaluation) through comparison with coordinates obtained 
		through actual surveys.
		The verified results showed that deviations of more than 90% of 
		triangulation stations were within 10cm of the correction parameters for 
		coordinates and were within 20cm of the correction parameters for 
		elevations. However, some triangulation stations had discrepancies of 
		more than 50cm. Since such cases are extremely rare, it was highly 
		likely that errors took place after obtaining previously established 
		Survey Results. 
		It should be noted that exclusions due to it being impossible to check 
		the accuracy of the correction parameters included the area within a 
		30km radius of the Fukushima No.1 nuclear power plant, the planned 
		evacuation zone and regions where crustal deformation due to relatively 
		large aftershocks following the Tohoku Earthquake occurred as observed 
		through surveys from GEONET stations and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) 
		interferometry. The revision of Survey Results for triangulation 
		stations not slated for resurvey was carried out based on these 
		correction parameters (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5).
		
	
		
			|  
			Fig. 4 Correction parameters developed for 
			coordinates | 
			 Fig. 5 Correction parameters developed for 
			elevations | 
		
		
		6. REVISION OF SURVEY RESULTS OF BENCH MARKS 
		The target accuracy of the correction parameters for elevations used 
		for the revision of Survey Results of triangulation stations was 10cm to 
		20cm and those parameters cannot be applied in the revision of Survey 
		Results of bench marks that requires elevation accuracy of 0.1mm to 1mm. 
		Therefore, revision of Survey Results of bench marks were, in essence, 
		to be done through resurvey, and network adjustment with multiple 
		reference points was calculated based on the updated elevation of the 
		Origin of the Japanese Vertical Control Network and high-precision 3D 
		surveys (leveling) conducted in the Tohoku and Kanto districts.
		When calculating network adjustment, it was essential to minimize the 
		impact on areas that do not include resurvey-slated leveling routes so 
		as to ensure a certain degree of accuracy. To do so, network adjustment 
		had to be calculated by designating multiple bench marks that were not 
		affected by the earthquake as reference points. The reference points 
		were determined, after discussion, to be the first-order bench mark 
		5527-2 located in Ninohe of Iwate as well as the Origin of the Japanese 
		Vertical Control Network.
		Revised Survey Results of bench marks obtained by network adjustment 
		calculations based on these two reference points were released on 
		October 31. Fig. 6 shows the difference between the revised Survey 
		Results and the Geodetic Coordinates 2000 (vertical).
		
		
		Fig. 6 Amount of displacement between revised Survey Results and the 
		Geodetic Coordinates 2000 (vertical) 
		7. CONCLUSION 
		Following the earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tohoku, notable 
		crustal deformation occurred over a wide area of eastern Japan, which 
		led to the stop of publication of Survey Results of GEONET stations and 
		triangulation stations in 16 prefectures and Survey Results of bench 
		marks from the Tohoku and Kanto districts on March 14, 2011 (with 
		addition of several areas on May 31).
		In order to contribute to swift restoration/reconstruction of the 
		disaster-stricken area, and to ensure stable provision of Survey Results 
		for many years to come, the amount of future deformation was estimated 
		by taking postseismic deformation monitored by GEONET stations into 
		account and, after discussions with regard to an appropriate time for 
		re-publication, revised Survey Results of GEONET stations were released 
		on May 31.
		Precise geodetic surveys were conducted at some of triangulation 
		stations, and Survey Results for the remaining triangulation stations 
		were revised through calculations based on the correction parameters.
		The revision of the Survey Results of bench marks was, in essence, 
		achieved through resurvey. High-precision 3D surveys were conducted in 
		the Tohoku and Kanto districts and network adjustment was calculated 
		based on the revised elevation for the Origin of the Japanese Vertical 
		Control Network.
		The revised Survey Results of triangulation stations and bench marks 
		were released on October 31. Because the coordinates/elevations of the 
		origins of the Japanese Horizontal/Vertical Control Network were 
		updated, and because Survey Results were revised across a wide area of 
		eastern Japan, the revised Survey Results of GEONET stations, 
		triangulation stations and bench marks across Japan were re-named with 
		the following title to make users aware of the changes: "Geodetic 
		Coordinates 2011."
		REFERENCES 
		DOI Hiromitsu, Toshihiro YAHAGI, Yasutomo SHIRAI, Mitsuo OHTAKI, 
		Tadashi SAITO, Toshihiro MINATO, Hiromi CHIBA, Takehisa INOUE, Katsuki 
		SUMIYA, Jun SUGAWARA, Yoshiyuki TANAKA, Hiroaki SAITA, Hideki KOJIMA, 
		Toru YUTSUDO, Tomomi AMAGAI, and Masao IWATA (2005): The Revision of 
		Geodetic Coordinates of Control Points Associated with the Tokachi-oki 
		Earthquake in 2003, Journal of the Geospatial Information Authority of 
		Japan, 108, 1-10. (Japanese) 
		Marone, C. J., C. H. Scholtz and R. Bilham (1991): On the Mechanics 
		of Earthquake Afterslip, Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, B5, 
		8441-8452. 
		MIURA Yuji, Kenji YOSHIDA, Kyoko KOTANI, Shinobu KURIHARA and Satoshi 
		KAWAMOTO (2009): VLBI-GPS Co-location Survey, Journal of the Geospatial 
		Information Authority of Japan, 119, 71-85. (Japanese) 
		NAKAGAWA Hiroyuki, Kojin WADA, Tadayuki KIKKAWA, Hisao SHIMO, Hisashi 
		ANDOU, Yuki KUROISHI, Yuki HATANAKA, Hiromi SHIGEMATSU, Kazuyuki TANAKA, 
		Yoichi FUKUDA(2003): Development of a New Japanese Geoid Model, 
		“GSIGEO2000”, Bulletin of the GSI, 49, 1-10. 
		SUITO Hisashi, Takuya NISHIMURA, Shinzaburo OZAWA, Tomokazu 
		KOBAYASHI, Mikio TOBITA, Tetsuro IMAKIIRE, Shinichiro HARA, Hiroshi 
		YARAI, Toshihiro YAHAGI, Hisao KIMURA and Satoshi KAWAMOTO (2011a): 
		Coseismic Deformation and Fault Model of the 2011 off the Pacific coast 
		of Tohoku Earthquake, Based on GEONET, Journal of the Geospatial 
		Information Authority of Japan, 122, 29-37. (Japanese) 
		SUITO Hisashi, Takuya NISHIMURA, Shinzaburo OZAWA, Mikio TOBITA, 
		Shinichiro HARA, Hiroshi YARAI, Toshihiro YAHAGI, Hisao KIMURA and 
		Satoshi KAWAMOTO (2011b): Postseismic Deformation and Postseismic Slip 
		Model Following the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, 
		Based on GEONET, Journal of the Geospatial Information Authority of 
		Japan, 122, 39-46. (Japanese) 
		TOBITA Mikio (2009): PatchJGD, Software for Correcting Geodetic 
		Coordinates for Coseismic Displacements, Journal of the Geodetic Society 
		of Japan, 55, 355-367. (Japanese)
		CONTACT
		
		Atsushi Yamagiwa
		Geospatial Information Authority of Japan
		Kitasato 1
		Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Pref., 305-0811
		Japan
		Tel. + 81-29-864-4719
		Fax + 81-29-864-1802
		Email: yamagiwa@gsi.go.jp 
		Web site: 
		http://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/index.html
		
		
		
		